Execute66 wrote:
Congratulations on another unique addition.
English is not my personal best;
Funny, ' cos your articulation by text and Video has been easy to understand to-date or do you mean my description wasn't exercised at its best leading to the vagueness by interpretation?
was your final sentence suggesting an indifferent feel to the gray weathering on this Exile?
Not the feel, measure of appearance only. Pick up something from a mud bath, one colour, less contrast, kinda one dimensional.
Sorry to quote again,
or you could have just edited your previous Post?
I was just reading parts afresh and again to better understand the point. Isn't grey weathering not meant to be a replica of another? "Consistently inconsistent" would be very much what I would expect (and want to expect) from grey weathering, or almost any degree of weathering. "Wear and tear" in the elements and during battle differ between sabers in our SW Universe.
Right. It's not meant to be an exact copy just like how V2s are weathered 'slightly' different from one to the next. The inconsistency is the method of application applied. You select a V2 from Site and what you come to expect is a dark weathered Hilt with randomly effected circular swirl patterns. Specific to V3 (well, my 3) SF simply states that Gray weathering is light weathering (which then suggests their V2 is medium weathering). All three appear to have been done differently and not just limited to the random effects of the light/heavy/blurred/defined circular stripped ring pattern.
Avenger has the coarse surface feel and texture (consistent with chemically reacted metal i.e. think of acid etching and left in its raw state) that affects the aluminium resulting in a brittle feel. If you're handy in the kitchen, think of poorly executed tempered chocolate. Doesn't have the smoothness associated with it and cracks under little stress.
Juggernaut just has a grainy texture resulting from the paint used. Think matte-painted surfaces or non-oil based paints.
Exile, different again. Looks to have been done using similar methods how a V2 is done but just a different colour instead of the black anodise. The completed result just looks to be a different coloured V2 than what the V3s are perceived to be.
Wear 'n tear and aging is one thing, if it underwent custom weathering to achieve a specific condition. When you Order a Standard Finish, you have come to expect brushed silver accented by black anodise. If you received say an all frosty silver with media blasting and accenting brushed silver contrary to the expected DT, it'd raise questions. Order a V2 and you expect a relatively dark Hilt (not black) with random effects of the swirling pattern but remains quite consistent e.g. My
V2 Chosen and how it was pictured next to
V2 Forsaken. V3? don't know what to expect. 'spose I could Order a V3 Reliant or a duplicate V3 Hilt of the three I have just to see but I don't wanna.
HotRod wrote:
I definitely like this finish the best of the 3 you've shown. It also sounds like this Saber was overall successful, other than a few little tid bits here and there.
Thanks HotRod.
'spose you're right, successfully finished from a successful delivery has become a rare occurrence that I may not know how to recognise it.
But you know, it still doesn't address the greeblie/switch positions confusion. Granted other Reviews are older (much like possibly the site images) but all that I've seen don't have them opposing unless it was say a Custom build?
I would agree with you that the omission of the quick connect option is puzzling indeed.
I suck at puzzles too. Maybe you can solve the riddle?
SuUpberSith wrote:
Hey bud, given you've bought a damned ton of sabers, any chance you can give SF an overall review?
And here I thought SaberForge Forum moonlighted as an Online Virtual Sabers Anonymous Site!?
However Yes, I have a problem. I buy a
ton of sabers and thank you for highlighting that observation to my attention by starting this intervention of yours.
Perhaps I should curb my shares and fade away from the foreground. As for an overall Review? Thought this was more a product Review place for fellow enthusiasts rather than a Company Review?
It would be helpful for us and SF if we knew all the strengths and where some improvement is needed.
I can't recognise how it would benefit the collective
us since (
I'd like to believe) my Reviews are quite transparent already with observations and criticisms including negative and positive. The Reviews are specific to what I receive and unless each and every saber that comes from SF is exact to the one before it (and before that), the conclusions would be a biased judgement. Besides, it's an accepted fact that SF doesn't patrol this Forum, so any feedback commenting on their strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats wouldn't achieve any traction in this platform. An email to SFCS maybe, but it becomes lost in the system.
In reality it would be cool if all who have more than around 8 sabers gave an summary of their overall exp
I like to believe I do that already on an individual basis. I don't conclude my Reviews with a numerical rating system though. My measures of value will be very different to another's. It isn't a regulated industry or is there regulation as a consensus with scoring. What is my cup of tea or isn't shouldn't influence another into buying (or not buying). Let them experience it for themselves. Recall the last time a mate/friend told you to go an see a particular Movie because it is frickin awesome and it turned out it wasn't?