I was involved in a discussion elsewhere on the interwebs about a perceived problem with the Star Wars setting; the Force and its depiction, specifically. We were presented with this statement(emphasis added):
The Force and the Universe is more complex than Dark and Light. These are terms used by simpletons who can't come to terms with the moral quagmire and billion perspectives of events happening.
The simpletons referred to are the Jedi and Sith. My personal thought was that, the question being light or dark, not Jedi or Sith, their dogmas and philosophies don't factor in. You don't
need Jedi or Sith to talk light or dark.
Then the assertion was made:
The only groups who distinguish between the Light and Dark side are the Jedi and Sith.
and
the conversation itself can't be held without talking about it in terms of the Jedi and the Sith and how they view the Force.
That's the farce that has been established with the setting. Everything is good vs. evil with no consideration for anything between.
Personally, I staunchly disagree with the above notion. The Light and Dark sides of the Force are, in my view, tangible realities of its existence. The Jedi and Sith are simply appendages to how each side manifests, and these aspects would exist even if Jedi and Sith had never been created.
How does that factor into the "moral quagmire"? The same way as most any other choice people make in life. The difference being that Force-users are superhumans, and the use of their abilities is way bigger drop in the pool of moral choice, particularly when these abilities are fueled by particular emotions.
What do you all think? Do the labels of Light and Dark strip the setting of moral ambiguity? Is it possible to dig into the Force without the context of Jedi or Sith?